The below diagrams are a taxonomic series in which we apply the methods described here to a series of hypothetical geometric layouts. Interpretation of these results is ongoing and discursive annotations will be added in due course.
-
- Connectivity for two parallel walls
-
- Covisibility for two parallel walls
-
- Compactness for two parallel walls
-
- Occlusivity for two parallel walls
-
- Connectivity for a central block
-
- Covisibility for a central block
-
- Compactness for a central block
-
- Occlusivity for a central block
-
- Connectivity for an offset block
-
- Covisibility for an offset block
-
- Compactness for an offset block
-
- Occlusivity for an offset block
-
- Connectivity for a corner block
-
- Covisibility for a corner block
-
- Compactness for a corner block
-
- Occlusivity for a corner block
-
- Connectivity for a cruciform
-
- Covisibility for a cruciform
-
- Compactness for a cruciform
-
- Occlusivity for a cruciform
-
- Connectivity for an open cruciform
-
- Covisibility for an open cruciform
-
- Compactness for an open cruciform
-
- Occlusivity for an open cruciform
-
- Connectivity for a ‘T’ block
-
- Covisibility for a ‘T’ block
-
- Compactness for a ‘T’ block
-
- Occlusivity for a ‘T’ block
-
- Connectivity for an open ‘T’ block
-
- Covisibility for an open ‘T’ block
-
- Compactness for an open ‘T’ block
-
- Occlusivity for an open ‘T’ block
The mappings above were produced using a methodology established in the context of a research project on Dynamic Three Dimensional Space Syntax Modelling directed by Sophia Psarra at UCL. The project was supported by the UCL Space Group EPSRC platform grant EP/G02619X/1 (P7726).